United States v. Saner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding statements made in response to questioning outside of the courtroom by Department of Justice prosecutor were testimonial
• A a target = s ex parte statements to a prosecutor who visited the target = s home were testimonial because the prosecutor was procuring these statements > with an eye toward trial = @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Russeau v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-29· cited 582×
• Wall v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-01-18· cited 566×
• Hammon v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 116×
• United States v. Brito
  First Circuit· 2005-10-20· cited 64×
• State v. Bobadilla
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-02-09· cited 52×
• State v. Staten
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-07· cited 25×
• Wall, Roger Morgan
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-01-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Rhode Island v. Innis
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
• Ohio v. Roberts
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
• Lilly v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
• United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James Herriman
  Seventh Circuit· 1999-11-19· cited 117×