United States v. Eddie Richardson, Carmen Tate, Rodney Palmer, Nate Hall, Stanley Westmoreland, Martell Lee, Sectric Curry, and Lennel Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the government would have a weak theory if its argument was \[the conspiracy] had a monopoly on drug sales in the [gang] territory; defendants sold drugs in the territory; therefore defendants... were members of the conspiracy\
• concluding that the government would have a weak theory if its argument was \[the conspiracy] had a monopoly on drug sales in the [gang] territory; defendants sold drugs in the territory; therefore defendants ... were members of the conspiracy\
• where the objective was monopolizing and controlling sales in a section of Chicago

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).