United States v. Eddie Lee Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that detective’s testimony that he knew the defendant as “Fast Eddy,” which was “completely unrelated to any of the other proof’ against him, should not have been admitted
• where only possible purpose of referring to defendant’s nickname was to show bad character, testimony as to nickname should not have been permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).