Ninth Circuit· 6/2/1999
United States v. Saenz
Citations
- 179 F.3d 686
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4201
- 99 Daily Journal DAR 5283
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11174
- 1999 WL 346627
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a defendant claiming self defense may show his own state of mind by testifying that he knew of the victim’s prior acts of violence” and by presenting “extrinsic corroborating evidence of the victim’s [known] acts of violence”
- explaining that prohibition on victim-prior-acts evidence “does not apply when a defendant seeks to introduce evidence that he knew of a victim’s other acts to show the defendant’s state of mind”
- holding Rule 404(b) does not prohibit a defendant from presenting evidence of his knowledge of a victim’s prior violent behavior or bad acts which caused defendant to have a subjective fear of imminent grave injury
- holding Rule 404(b) does not exclude evidence related to specific instances of a victim’s prior violent conduct when the defendant knew of the victim’s prior conduct at the time of the alleged offense to show the defendant’s state of mind
- “[E]xtrinsic evidence concerning a victim’s past acts is admissible under Rule 404(b) to show defendant’s state of mind.”
- “One of the elements of self defense is the defendant’s reasonable belief that his use of force was necessary. To support the rea sonableness of his belief, Saenz sought to introduce evidence that he knew (1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hawkins, Lay, Pregerson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Michael H. Boulware, United States of America v. Michael H. BoulwareNinth Circuit· 2004-09-14· cited 151×
- United States v. Jay R. Bishop, United States of America v. Gene R. CardenazNinth Circuit· 2002-05-30· cited 89×
- United States v. James Allen GreggEighth Circuit· 2006-06-29· cited 82×
- Strong v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2020-06-29· cited 51×
- United States v. Denny Johnson, Sr.Eighth Circuit· 2017-06-29· cited 41×
- United States v. DobsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-03-20· cited 36×
- United States v. SheehanD.C. Circuit· 2008-01-11· cited 26×
- United States v. Eric ChristianNinth Circuit· 2014-04-17· cited 21×
- Christopher v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2012-09-28· cited 20×
- United States v. Rudy GarciaNinth Circuit· 2013-07-19· cited 17×
- United States v. BallouD. New Mexico· 2014-10-16· cited 15×
- United States v. ArmajoTenth Circuit· 2022-06-23· cited 12×
- Copeland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-05-31· cited 10×
- State v. E. GomezMontana Supreme Court· 2020-03-31· cited 4×
- State v. FiskOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-11· cited 4×
- United States v. Montiel-SanchezNinth Circuit· 2006-03-17· cited 2×
- United States v. BranumNinth Circuit· 2001-11-15· cited 1×
- United States v. Rudy GarciaNinth Circuit· 2013-08-13
- De Los Reyes v. De Mesa LinayaoNinth Circuit· 2004-11-10
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Ronald Keiser, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 1995-06-16· cited 92×
- United States v. John Edward SpencerNinth Circuit· 1993-07-07· cited 52×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernestine Audry JAMES, A/K/A Ernestine James, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1999-03-09· cited 35×
- United States v. ThomasNinth Circuit· 1998-01-22· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.