United States v. Ruth Studley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that sovereign-citizen tax arguments have “been consistently and thoroughly 23 rejected by every branch of the government for decades” and that “such utterly meritless arguments [are] now the basis for serious sanctions imposed on civil litigants who raise them”
• concluding that recusal is not required
• “a judge is not disqualified by a litigant’s suit or threatened suit against him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).