Chukwuma E. Azubuko v. Judge C. Ashley Royal in Official and Individual Capacity

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that recusal is inappropriate simply because a litigant has filed a lawsuit against the judge presiding over her case
• holding that the presiding federal judge did not have to recuse merely because the litigant had sued her among many other federal judges
• recognizing Congress expanded 42 U.S.C. §1983 to provide immunity to judges against injunctive relief claims
• recognizing Congress expanded 42 U.S.C. §1983 to provide immunity to judges against injunctive relief claims
• recognizing Congress expanded section 1983 to provide immunity to judges against injunctive relief claims
• barring a claim for injunctive relief where the plaintiff had not alleged that a declaratory decree was violated or that declaratory relief was unavailable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).