United States v. Roy Neset

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the “district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Neset's affirmative defenses attacking the validity of the microbroadcasting regulations”
• holding the “district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Neset's affirmative defenses attacking the validity of the microbroadcasting regulations”
• holding the “district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Neset's affirmative defenses attacking the validity of the microbroadcasting regulations”
• holding the “district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Neset's affirmative defenses attacking the validity of the microbroadcasting regulations”
• holding the “district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Neset's affirmative defenses attacking the validity of the microbroadcasting regulations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• North Dakota Family Alliance, Inc. v. Bader
  D. North Dakota· 2005-03-21· cited 20×
• United States v. Jerry Szoka
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-07-30· cited 16×
• Consolidated Telephone Cooperative v. Western Wireless Corp.
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-12-28· cited 9×
• Dolls, Inc. v. City of Coralville, Iowa
  S.D. Iowa· 2006-03-24· cited 6×
• State v. Actavis Pharma, Inc. & a.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2017-06-30· cited 5×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
• National Broadcasting Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1943-05-10· cited 782×
• Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 225×
• United States v. Alcon Laboratories, Etc.
  First Circuit· 1981-02-24· cited 50×
• Ralph M. Wynn, M. D. v. Bernard Carey
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-05-22· cited 44×
• Prayze Fm, Also Known as Incom, L.L.C., Mark Blake and Loretta Spivey v. Federal Communications Commission
  Second Circuit· 2000-06-05· cited 32×
• United States v. Stephen Paul Dunifer
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-07-20· cited 28×
• William Leigh Dougan v. Federal Communications Commission, United States of America
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-04-20· cited 23×
• United States v. Dunifer
  N.D. California· 1998-06-16· cited 16×
• United States v. Any & All Radio Station Transmission Equipment
  D. Minnesota· 1997-09-05· cited 11×
• United States v. Neset
  D. North Dakota· 1998-06-24· cited 11×
• Free Speech ex rel. Ruggiero v. Reno
  Second Circuit· 1999-10-29· cited 10×
• United States v. Any & All Radio Station Equipment
  S.D. New York· 2000-03-31· cited 4×
• Prayze FM v. United States
  D. Connecticut· 1999-11-08· cited 4×
• United States v. Any & All Radio Station Transmission Equipment
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-02-25· cited 3×
• Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Arkansas Public Service Commission
  Eighth Circuit· 1984-07-03· cited 2×

Other cases named United States v. Roy Neset

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Roy Neset
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-11-28