United States v. Stephen Paul Dunifer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction under applicable statutory framework to decide microbroadcaster's constitutional challenges to licensing regulations
• holding district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction under applicable statutory framework to decide microbroadcaster’s constitutional challenges to licensing regulations
• stating that “[w]e have squarely held, however, that challenging FCC regulations is equivalent to an action to enjoin, annul, or set aside an order of the FCC”
• explaining that district courts lack jurisdiction over any challenge to FCC regulations
• explaining that district courts lack jurisdiction over any challenge to FCC regulations
• “Dougan relied too broadly on Pleasant Broadcasting, in which the parties did not challenge the underlying regulations, but merely asserted standard defenses to the validity of the FCC orders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).