Skip to main content
· 6/16/1998

United States v. Dunifer

Citations

  • 997 F. Supp. 1235
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 9048
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9010
  • 1998 WL 315121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant microbroadcaster lacked standing to challenge regulations because he had not applied for a license or waiver
  • holding defendant microbroadcaster lacked standing to challenge regulations because he had not applied for a license or waiver
  • noting earlier stay of litigation under doctrine of primary jurisdiction in light of then-pending FCC forfeiture proceeding
  • noting earlier stay of litigation under doctrine of primary jurisdiction in light of then-pending FCC forfeiture proceeding
  • noting earlier stay of litigation under doctrine of primary jurisdiction in light of then-pending FCC forfeiture proceeding
  • “Where the defendant asserts an affirmative defense requiring the litigation of issues not encompassed in the plaintiffs case-in-chief, the defendant is in a similar situation on those issues to a plaintiff who is invoking the jurisdiction of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.