Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Courts of Appeal have exclusive jurisdiction to review FCC orders
• noting that the Court of Appeals may remand to the agency to further develop the administrative record when the administrative record is inadequate
• stating that, “[exclusive jurisdiction for review of final FCC orders ... lies in the Court of Appeals.”
• stating that, “to prevail on a Strickland- based ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim, [the petitioner] must satisfy two prongs: (1
• noting that the Court of Appeals may remand to the agency to further develop the administrative record when the administrative record is inadequate
• noting, under the federal Sunshine Act, that informal background discussions that clarify issues and expose varying views are a necessary part of an agency’s work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).