United States v. Robert Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the history of the VWPA is not “marked by steady congressional erosion, but rather by constant expansion of the restitution remedy”
• observing that restitution in federal criminal law bears “not a history marked by steady congressional erosion, but rather by constant expansion of the restitution remedy”
• collecting cases demonstrating “an unwavering line of [circuit court] precedent” holding that federal, state, county, and city governments may be “victims” under the VWPA
• listing cases in other circuits and holding that it is a “settled view . . . supported by an unwavering line of precedent from other federal courts of appeals” that government agencies can be victims for restitution
• listing cases in other circuits and holding that it is a “settled view . . . supported by an unwavering line of precedent from other federal courts of appeals” that government agencies can be victims for restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).