United States v. Robert Junior Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that we may consider forfeited issues to, among other things, “promote procedural efficiency” (cleaned up)
• holding that, notwithstanding its decision to vacate district court’s commitment order, court of appeals lacked jurisdiction to order release of defendant because subsequent proceedings had been initiated with respect to him under § 4246(a
• stating that \courts of appeals generally refuse to consider issues not passed upon by lower courts\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).