Seventh Circuit· 8/15/2006
United States v. Tony Lapi
Citations
- 458 F.3d 555
- 2006 WL 2347368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court lacked statutory authority for a section 4246 hearing when \the statutory requirement of certification had not been met\ and the defendant was no longer in federal custody
- observing that § 4246 is “drafted narrowly” and applies only in rare circumstances
- holding the district court lacked authority to conduct a dan- gerousness hearing under § 4246 when the state facility deter- mined the defendant no longer required hospitalization and had already released him
- noting that federal district court no longer had authority to intervene after “state civil commitment proceedings were instituted and the defendant was transferred to state custody” as contemplated by § 4246(a) (emphasis omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ripple, Manion, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. VolungusFirst Circuit· 2010-01-08· cited 214×
- Holocaust Victims of v. OTP BankSeventh Circuit· 2012-08-22· cited 115×
- United States v. WebberSeventh Circuit· 2008-07-29· cited 77×
- United States v. Godinez-OrtizNinth Circuit· 2009-04-29· cited 20×
- United States v. Joaquin FoyThird Circuit· 2015-10-05· cited 15×
- Holocaust Victims of v. Erste Group BankSeventh Circuit· 2012-08-22· cited 8×
- United States v. ChaudhryNinth Circuit· 2011-01-03· cited 6×
- Ecker v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2009-08-03· cited 4×
- United States v. BoninFifth Circuit· 2008-08-19· cited 3×
- United States v. Webber, VickieSeventh Circuit· 2008-07-29
- Holocaust Victims of Bank Thef v. Erste Group BankSeventh Circuit· 2012-08-22
- United States v. Pedro Godinez-OrtezNinth Circuit· 2009-04-29
- United States v. CoadTenth Circuit· 2026-05-11
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-11-17· cited 1,679×
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-02-21· cited 989×
- United States v. S.A.Eighth Circuit· 1997-11-17· cited 104×
- United States v. Robert Junior BakerSixth Circuit· 1986-12-29· cited 80×
- United States v. Roosevelt D. VallerySeventh Circuit· 2006-02-07· cited 58×
- United States v. Thamin ShawarSeventh Circuit· 1989-01-06· cited 39×
- In Re: Ford Motor Company and Bridgestone/firestone North American Tire, Llc, as Successor to Bridgestone/firestone, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2003-10-22· cited 31×
- United States v. Sergius A. RinaldiSeventh Circuit· 2003-12-01· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.