United States v. John Ecker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding where last assault occurred ten years ago and no assault in three years of confinement did not require a conclusion of not dangerous
• explaining that the initial challenges to the defendant’s competency occurred in the -2- the Government filed a certificate from the warden under § 4246(a
• holding where last assault occurred ten years ago and no assault in three years of confinement did not require a conclusion of not dangerous
• affirming dangerousness finding despite “the fact that [defendant’s] last assault occurred over ten years ago, and that [defendant] had not assaulted anyone during his three years in confinement”
• finding evidence sufficient to prove defendant’s dangerousness was the “result of’ his mental condition
• finding evidence sufficient to commit prisoner despite differences in expert opinions regarding dangerousness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).