Second Circuit· 5/16/1995

United States v. Robert E. Delano

Citations

55 F.3d 720
1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11626
1995 WL 299867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing RICO convictions where the seventeen invalidated predicate acts of larceny by extortion “represented the bulk of th[e] RICO prosecution, eclipsing all else.”
reviewing sufficiency argument for plain error after holding that defendant, who raised specific sufficiency challenges below, forfeited all other sufficiency challenges
reviewing a defendant’s claim for plain error because the defendant, in his initial Rule 29 motion, “stated a ground different from what he now urges on appeal”
affirming defendant’s conviction by noting that he was not only an agent of the parks department but also an agent of the city, thereby making him an agent of an organization from which he stole funds
change from \City of Buffalo Parks Department\ to the \City of Buffalo\ did not materially alter the indictment
tree removal company removed trees with the understanding that the official would assign jobs “which the company ordinarily would not have received”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Winter, Mahoney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.