· 5/1/1984
United States v. Robert Brutzman
Citations
- 731 F.2d 1449
- 15 Fed. R. Serv. 1130
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22970
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that the district court did not abuse its “wide discretion” by refusing to give three requested instructions
- holding that letters mailed after the defrauder received money may be in furtherance of fraudulent scheme
- court’s refusal to give missing witness instruction not erroneous where witness pleaded the Fifth
- evidence was cumulative or “not exculpatory”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boochever, Chambers, Sneed, -Chever
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.