Skip to main content
· 5/1/1984

United States v. Robert Brutzman

Citations

  • 731 F.2d 1449
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 1130
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that the district court did not abuse its “wide discretion” by refusing to give three requested instructions
  • holding that letters mailed after the defrauder received money may be in furtherance of fraudulent scheme
  • court’s refusal to give missing witness instruction not erroneous where witness pleaded the Fifth
  • evidence was cumulative or “not exculpatory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Chambers, Sneed, -Chever

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.