United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Harvey Myerson, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorneys have substantial latitude to suggest that inferences be drawn from evidence as long as evidence is not misstated
• “[T]he district court properly rejected Myerson's attempts to call Cooper solely for the purpose of having the jury hear his invocation of the privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).