United States v. Natividad Duran, United States of America v. Martin Roman, United States of America v. Rodolfo Almaraz Mora

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant had not demonstrated either the Lord or Westerdahl bases for compelling immunity
• explaining that “the inference of an overall agreement is drawn from proof of a single objective ... or from proof that the key participants and the method of operation remained constant throughout the conspiracy.”
• authorization applied to “any changed telephone number assigned to a telephone with the same electronic serial number” as the target telephone number
• authorization applied to “any changed telephone number assigned to a telephone with the same electronic serial number” as the target telephone number
• authorization applied to “any changed telephone number assigned to a telephone with the same electronic serial number” as the target telephone number
• neither the Lord test nor the Westerdahl test was even applicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).