United States v. Samuel Manarite and Jeanne Manarite

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that multiple object conspiracy convictions can stand provided that any one of the objects supports the conviction and that it is clear that the jury found the defendant guilty of conspiracy with respect to that object
• “Lulling schemes can include mailings sent by someone other than the defrauder, even routine mailings in the ordinary course of business.”
• defining inducement as “government conduct that creates a substantial risk that an otherwise law-abiding person will commit a crime”
• mailings may also be part of an ongoing scheme where the fraudster was attempting to facilitate additional transactions
• factoring redacted evidence into Rule 403 analysis to determine that trial judge did not abuse discretion in admitting evidence
• sham credit transaction likely to be discovered when the creditor processed the false credit application through the mail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).