United States v. Rogelio Teran-Salas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a similar argument where the defendant failed to show a realistic probability that the statute at issue had been applied in an “administering” situation
• “Because § 481.112(a) criminalizes discrete acts— manufacturing, delivering, and possessing with intent to deliver—it is divisible.”
• “Because § 48Í .112(a) criminalizes discrete acts— manufacturing,, delivering, and possessing with intent to deliver—it is divisible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).