Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Seventh Circuit· 9/12/2000

United States v. Robert Bailey

Citations

  • 227 F.3d 792
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22922
  • 2000 WL 1281332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3 enhancement does not require victim’s subjective belief that defendant occupies position of trust
  • finding no intentional relinquishment of right to object to jury instruction on appeal where defense counsel made an objection at trial to proposed instruction but argued on appeal the instruction was improper for reasons different from those previously cited
  • finding no intentional relinquishment of right to object to jury instruction on appeal where defense counsel made an objection at trial to proposed instruction but argued on appeal the instruction was improper for reasons different from those previously cited
  • for purposes of Hobbs Act, “robbery of cocaine dealers generally has an effect on commerce”
  • drugs imported from South America held to have traveled in interstate commerce
  • declining to reach the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Robert Bailey

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.