Skip to main content
· 3/7/1988

United States v. James Oliver Hocking

Citations

  • 841 F.2d 735
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3317
  • 1988 WL 21901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that district court lacked authority to extend time to file Rule 33 motion after seven-day period had elapsed
  • appellate jurisdiction was found where the district court lacked the authority to dispose of untimely motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Flaum, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.