· 3/7/1988
United States v. James Oliver Hocking
Citations
- 841 F.2d 735
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3317
- 1988 WL 21901
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that district court lacked authority to extend time to file Rule 33 motion after seven-day period had elapsed
- appellate jurisdiction was found where the district court lacked the authority to dispose of untimely motions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Flaum, Easterbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.