Skip to main content
· 8/6/2001

United States v. Thomas Anderson

Citations

  • 259 F.3d 853
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 17416
  • 2001 WL 877626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that adjustment applies even if the minor does not know she is being used to commit the offense
  • affirming the denial of a reduction for acceptance of responsibility when the defendant did not argue that his case was extraordinary and when the district court properly applied an obstruction of justice adjustment
  • district court’s factual finding that defendant occupied a position of trust is reviewed for clear error
  • district court’s factual finding that defendant occupied a position of trust is reviewed for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Evans, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.