United States v. Ring

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a document exchanged between the parties was not a “judicial record” where a court opinion “mention[ed] information similar” to the document’s contents but “the [c]ourt had not seen” the document

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Saena Tech Corporation
  District of Columbia· 2015-10-21· cited 9×
• In Re: Application for Access to Certain Sealed Video Exhibits
  District of Columbia· 2021-06-30
• In the Matter of the Application of the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia to Unseal Certain Records
  District of Columbia· 2022-06-13

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 4,546×
• Bennett v. Spear
  Supreme Court· 1997-03-19· cited 3,786×
• Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 1,798×
• Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Riverside
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,326×
• Skilling v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 987×
• Hollingsworth v. Perry
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-26· cited 967×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 1996-11-01· cited 169×
• United States v. Pickard
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-11-05· cited 105×
• United States v. El-Sayegh, Hani
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-12-16· cited 93×
• In Re Special Grand Jury 89-2
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-06-15· cited 63×
• United States v. Kevin Ring
  D.C. Circuit· 2013-01-25· cited 54×
• Primas v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 2013-06-21· cited 26×
• United States v. Ring
  District of Columbia· 2011-09-20· cited 5×