United States v. Pickard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that district courts have continuing jurisdiction to enforce sealing orders and to grant access to sealed documents \even if the case in which the documents were sealed has ended\
• noting that district court, when sealing record, should consider whether supplying a redacted version of the record would adequately protect the interests of the party seeking the seal
• observing that when weighing an interest in sealing against the presumption of public access, courts first consider whether selective redaction may be effective before sealing even documents in their entirety
• reviewing decision to seal or unseal documents for an abuse of discretion
• \We review for an abuse of discretion the district court's decisions regarding whether to seal or unseal documents.\
• A court can unseal documents “based upon the court’s inherent supervisory authority over its own files and records.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).