Skip to main content
· 6/21/2013

Primas v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 405 U.S. App. D.C. 343
  • 719 F.3d 693
  • 2013 WL 3108668
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12722
  • 118 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • glossing over plaintiff’s arguments for pretext and focusing on plaintiff’s “best case”
  • denying summary judgment but pointing out that “a jury could reasonably view the evidence differently and conclude that [the defendant] is telling the truth or, even if not, that she had some other non-discriminatory reason for her actions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel, Kavanaugh, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.