· 12/19/2000
United States v. Rashed, Mohammed
Citations
- 234 F.3d 1280
- 344 U.S. App. D.C. 150
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 32494
- 2000 WL 1811207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Rule 16 applies when the defendant seeks information relating “to refutation of the government’s case in chief”
- defendant’s “‘sham prosecution’ allegation” was insufficient to satisfy the Armstrong standard for compelled discovery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams, Randolph, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.