Skip to main content
· 12/19/2000

United States v. Rashed, Mohammed

Citations

  • 234 F.3d 1280
  • 344 U.S. App. D.C. 150
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 32494
  • 2000 WL 1811207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Rule 16 applies when the defendant seeks information relating “to refutation of the government’s case in chief”
  • defendant’s “‘sham prosecution’ allegation” was insufficient to satisfy the Armstrong standard for compelled discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Randolph, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.