Skip to main content
· 1/3/1992

United States v. Certain Real Property and Premises Known as 38 Whalers Cove Drive, Babylon, New York, Edward J. Levin, Claimant-Appellant

Citations

  • 954 F.2d 29
  • 1992 WL 2532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Supreme Court's decision in Halper applied to civil forfeitures
  • holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Halper applied to civil forfeitures
  • suggesting that one sovereign “must have effectively manipulated the actions of the [other sovereign] so that [its] officials retained little or no independent volition.”
  • suggesting that one sovereign “must have effectively manipulated the actions of the [other sovereign] so that [its] officials retained little or no independent volition.”
  • suggesting that one sovereign \must have effectively manipulated the actions of the [other sovereign] so that [its] officials retained little or no independent volition.\
  • upholding the forfeiture of a condominium in which the claimant had a $68,000 equity interest and which was used in connection with isolated sales of 2fi grams of cocaine for $250

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pierce, Winter, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.