Skip to main content
· 1/6/1984

United States v. Yagih Aboumoussallem

Citations

  • 726 F.2d 906
  • 14 Fed. R. Serv. 1403
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a joint investigation by state and federal authorities does not preclude separate prosecutions
  • noting that “a narrow exception to the ‘dual sovereignty’ doctrine, carved out in Bartkus v. Illinois, bars a second prosecution where one prosecuting sovereign can be said to be acting as a ‘tool’ of the (. . . continued
  • relying on Bartkus to hold that a second prosecution by another sovereign is barred when it is a “‘[s]ham and a cover’ for the first”
  • evidence that defendant's cousins duped another person into transporting hashish not inadmissible under Rule 404(b)
  • evidence that defendant's cousins duped another person into transporting hashish not inadmissible under Rule 404(b)
  • upholding exclusion of testimony to avoid “trial within a trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Friendly, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.