Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 3/16/2007

United States v. Ramirez

Citations

  • 479 F.3d 1229
  • 2007 WL 779260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding statements of co-conspirators procured through a wiretap are not testimonial because they were made in furtherance of a conspiracy
  • holding statements of co-conspirators procured through a wiretap are not testimonial because they were made in furtherance of a conspiracy
  • holding statements of co-conspirators procured through a wiretap are non- testimonial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, McWilliams, Seymour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.