United States v. Edge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute at issue was \complete and unambiguous” and that plaintiff \failed to show [through legislative history] that Congress meant what it did not say”
• “Both of plaintiffs legal theories are based on legislative history which is limited solely to the Senate. While plaintiff speaks repeatedly of the intent of Congress, it has at most offered evidence of the intent of the Senate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).