Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 1/28/2009

United States v. Ramirez

Citations

  • 557 F.3d 200
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1886
  • 2009 WL 189071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that New Jersey’s laws delineate crimes with intent to cause “serious bodily injury” and “significant bodily injury,” with the former classified as the greater offense
  • holding “court has the discretion to 2 Case: 24-20454 Document: 83-1 Page: 3 Date Filed: 12/05/2025 No. 24-20454 address [an] issue [raised by Appellant for first time in reply brief in response to Appellee’s brief]”.
  • exercising discretion to consider issue raised in appellee’s brief and addressed in reply
  • “This court does not entertain arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief.”
  • “This court does not entertain arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief.”
  • “This court does not entertain arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Stewart, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.