Skip to main content
· 5/21/2010

United States v. Palomino Garcia

Citations

  • 606 F.3d 1317
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10380
  • 2010 WL 2011038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the generic offense of aggravated assault under the guidelines includes assault with a deadly weapon
  • recognizing we have employed ACCA’s categorical approach in cases that interpret guideline enhancements
  • describing the Supreme Court’s process in Taylor for deriving a generic definition of the traditional, common-law offense of burglary
  • applying the Supreme Court’s pre-Descamps “categorical approach” cases to USSG § 2L1.2
  • “Although Taylor and Shepard were ACCA cases, we have employed their ‘categorical approach’ in determining whether a prior offense qualifies for an enhancement under the Guidelines.”
  • “[W]hen the law under which a defendant has been convicted contains different statutory phrases—some of which require the use of force and some of which do not—the judgment is ambiguous and we apply a ‘modified categorical approach.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Martin, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.