· 5/21/2010
United States v. Palomino Garcia
Citations
- 606 F.3d 1317
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10380
- 2010 WL 2011038
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the generic offense of aggravated assault under the guidelines includes assault with a deadly weapon
- recognizing we have employed ACCA’s categorical approach in cases that interpret guideline enhancements
- describing the Supreme Court’s process in Taylor for deriving a generic definition of the traditional, common-law offense of burglary
- applying the Supreme Court’s pre-Descamps “categorical approach” cases to USSG § 2L1.2
- “Although Taylor and Shepard were ACCA cases, we have employed their ‘categorical approach’ in determining whether a prior offense qualifies for an enhancement under the Guidelines.”
- “[W]hen the law under which a defendant has been convicted contains different statutory phrases—some of which require the use of force and some of which do not—the judgment is ambiguous and we apply a ‘modified categorical approach.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dubina, Martin, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.