Skip to main content
· 12/7/2007

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Vaughn

Citations

  • 509 F.3d 1085
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28313
  • 2007 WL 4276671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that litigants “waived [an] argument by raising it for the first time in their reply brief”
  • stating that the parties “waived [an] argument by raising it for the first time in their reply brief”
  • refusing to exercise pendent appellate jurisdiction over an exhaustion issue decided in the same district court order as the collaterally appealable question
  • refusing to exercise pendent appellate jurisdiction over an exhaustion issue decided in the same district court order as the collaterally appealable ques- tion
  • applying the collateral order doctrine to a suit brought against tribal officials where sovereign immunity would have barred the action if not for the Ex parte Young exception
  • applying Johnson to an interlocutory ap- peal of a denial of tribal sovereign immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcón, Thompson, Tallman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.