United States v. Kamadeen Idowu Oladimeji

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the relevant question in imposing restitution under the MVRA is whether the “loss [is] caused by the specific conduct that is the basis of the offense of conviction”
• holding that appeal waiver does not apply to components of sentence not specifically mentioned
• finding that defendant’s 11 appeal waiver, construed narrowly, did not bar challenges to “the portion of his sentence commanding payment of restitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).