United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the “nature of the government’s inducement was” how the government encouraged its target to violate the law, i.e., an FBI informant told the target about a fictional plan “to blow up the Outlaws[ ] [Motorcycle Club’s] clubhouse”
• citing, inter alia, Girard for the proposition that “information itself is enough to meet the property or ‘thing of value’ element of the statute.”
• asserting a violation of the right to a fair trial because “one morning (citing United States v. Barger, 931 F.2d 359, 370–72 (6th Cir. 1991); Reynolds v. Gomez, 108 F.3d 338 (9th Cir. 1997); United States v. Jarvis, 792 F.2d 767, 768–70 (9th Cir. 1986)).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).