United States v. Michael K. Hebeka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying new Guidelines where a single offense lasted for multiple years and thus constituted a “continuing offense”
• declining to find waiver and allowing the government to “reasonably change direction” and pursue a new argument during a subsequent appeal when presenting the argument in the original appeal would not have been logical
• defendant redeemed fraudulently received food stamp benefits to the USDA in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 2024(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).