United States v. Roger Allen Clark (93-5596) Jeffrey Mullins (93-5597)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statements identifying participants and their respective roles in the conspiracy are made in furtherance of a conspiracy
• holding that sufficient “independent evidence is not merely a scintilla, but rather enough to rebut the presumed unreliability of hearsay”
• holding that sufficient “independent evidence is not merely a scintilla, but rather enough to rebut the presumed unreliability of hearsay”
• noting that this Court reviews such determinations for clear error
• noting that this Court reviews such determinations for clear error
• finding “the independent evidence sufficiently corroborates the out of court statements to establish [the defendant’s] participation in a conspiracy by a preponderance of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).