United States v. Scott Scarborough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the admission of an audio recording constitutes an abuse of discretion “where the unintelligible portions of a tape recording are so substantial that the recording as a whole is rendered untrustworthy” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• failure to raise constitutional objection below operates as waiver of objection on appeal
• applying this concept to a Brady claim
• reviewing recorded tapes on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).