Skip to main content
· 2/8/2008

United States v. Pruneda

Citations

  • 518 F.3d 597
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2784
  • 2008 WL 341459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Upon legally entering a residence, officers have the authority to conduct a protective sweep of the residence if the officers reasonably believe, based on specific and articulable facts, that the residence harbors an individual who could be dangerous.”
  • a jury’s determination of witness credibility “is not ours to dispute”
  • finding no clear error where defendant was merely a courier
  • no abuse of discretion admitting relevant pornographic images
  • no abuse of discretion admitting relevant pornographic images

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Wollman, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.