United States v. Samuel Khabeer, Sr., United States of America v. Karen Cox Khabeer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that items not listed in warrant could be seized where record supported that items were in plain view of officers who were lawfully present and who did not search beyond what warrant authorized
• relying on Murray’s admonition that “it is the function of the District Court rather than the Court of Appeals to determine the facts” in making a limited remand
• relying on Murray's admonition that \it is the function of the District Court rather than the Court of Appeals to determine the facts\ in making a limited remand
• officer may seize items that are in plain view if the officer is legally present at the location and the items are immediately recognizable as incriminatory
• “[W]e remand the case to the district court for the limited purpose of making supplemental findings of fact necessary to the resolution of the . . . claims, while retaining jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).