United States v. Jose Ramos-Caraballo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e cannot say that these [evidentiary] issues were central to or even marginally impacted on the jury’s finding of guilt.”
• observation of seven and three-quarters inches long tree-shaped air freshener hanging from rearview mirror provided adequate basis for reasonable and articulable suspicion that driver’s view was obstructed or unclear
• “[W]e cannot say that these [evidentiary] issues were central to or even marginally impacted on the jury’s finding of guilt.”
• where evidence is at most an extra helping of what jury has heard before, evidence is merely cumulative and its admission does not result in reversible error
• an air freshener provided probable cause
• an air freshener provided probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).