United States v. Whirlwind Soldier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that under Rita a judge is not required to give more extensive reasons for imposing a sentence within the Guidelines range when clear that the “judge listened to the argument and considered supporting evidence”
• noting that \the defendant's role in the offense\ is a finding of fact
• minimal participant reduction not warranted where the defendant “was an active and frequent seller of methamphetamine and was responsible for coordinating the transportation and distribution of drugs by others”
• reviewing for clear error the district court’s drug-quantity finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).