Skip to main content
· 6/19/2007

United States v. Proctor, Douglas

Citations

  • 489 F.3d 1348
  • 376 U.S. App. D.C. 512
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 14359
  • 2007 WL 1745311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, “if a standard impoundment procedure exists, a police officer’s failure to adhere thereto is unreasonable and violates the Fourth Amendment.”
  • “if a standard impoundment procedure exists, a police officer’s failure to adhere thereto is unreasonable and violates the Fourth Amendment”
  • for inventory search to be reasonable, standard impoundment and inventory procedures must be followed
  • for inventory search to be reasonable, standard impoundment and inventory procedures must be followed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.