Skip to main content
· 10/5/1977

United States v. Thomas E. Reese

Citations

  • 561 F.2d 894
  • 183 U.S. App. D.C. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirmed exclusion of document; “the trial court has broad discretion in determining whether documents otherwise admissible as business records are sufficiently trustworthy.”
  • no claim or showing that agreement was more probative than any other evidence defendant could procure through reasonable means
  • blanket privilege sustained because “the only relevant matters” that the witness might have testified about were all privileged
  • suggesting the probative value of evasive action
  • suggesting the probative value of evasive action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bazelon, Leventhal, MacKINNON

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.