OLANIYI v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Harbert and explaining that the plaintiff had not identified potential facts that could \overcome the qualified immunity defense\
• noting “conclusory allegations are not entitled to an assumption of truth”
• “In [the D.C. Circuit], a community caretaking impoundment ‘must be based on (1) a reasonable standard practice procedure governing decisions on whether to impound vehicles and (2
• “[T]o survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint asserting a § 1983 claim must allege a predicate constitutional violation which was caused by a policy of the District of Columbia.”
• permitting voluntary dismissal “in the interest of justice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).