Skip to main content

State v. Lee

Citations

  • 976 So. 2d 109
  • 2008 WL 343031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing the admission of such evidence “particularly when the modus operandi employed by the defendant in both the charged crime and uncharged offenses is so peculiarly distinctive one must logically say they were the work of the same person”
  • 123 of 125 prospective jurors (98.4%) were “at least vaguely familiar” with the case through media accounts or informal private conversations
  • 123 of 125 prospective jurors (98.4%) were “at least vaguely familiar” with the case through media accounts or informal private conversations
  • 123 of 125 prospective jurors (98.4%) were “at least vaguely familiar” with the case through media accounts or informal private conversations
  • “[Tjhere were a number of defensive wounds on Pace’s arms, forearms’, hands and wrists”
  • “Warrants ... are generally required to search an individual’s home or person, ‘unless “the exigencies of the situation” make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that the warrantless search is objectively reasonable Runder the Fourth Amendment.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knoll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

111 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

117 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.