Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 7/13/1998

United States v. Pollani

Citations

  • 146 F.3d 269
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 16055
  • 1998 WL 387525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the district court had a valid “interest in maintaining its docket and keeping cases on schedule”
  • noting that the district 4 Case: 20-50438 Document: 00515994458 Page: 5 Date Filed: 08/25/2021 No. 20-50438 court had a “validly protected” “interest in maintaining its docket and keeping cases on schedule”
  • The district court would be justified in denying a continuance attached to a post-waiver request for counsel because the defendant waited too long to retain counsel.
  • The district court would be justified in denying a continuance attached to a post-waiver request for counsel because the defendant waited too long to retain counsel.
  • The district court would be justified in denying a continuance attached to a post-waiver request for counsel because the defendant waited too long to retain counsel.
  • \[A] pro se litigant may not abuse his right [to counsel] by strategically requesting special appearances by counsel or by repeatedly altering his position on counsel to achieve delay or obstruct the orderly administration of justice.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reayley, Demoss, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Pollani

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.