Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 6/25/2024

United States v. Boukamp

Citations

  • 105 F.4th 717

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial courts have the “discretion to require [a pro se party’s] testimony to be in question-and-answer, rather than narrative, form”
  • district judge ensured that incarcerated defendant seeking to proceed pro se had “full knowledge” of “restricted” access to discovery by giving incarcerated defendant a similar warning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.