United States v. Sharp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Confrontation Clause was violated but finding no plain error where the defendant had failed to raise the issue before the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Hamann
  Fifth Circuit· 2022-05-12· cited 8×
• Patrick Reed v. Harold May
  Sixth Circuit· 2025-04-11· cited 5×
• United States v. Price
  Fifth Circuit· 2022-05-12

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Deck v. Missouri
  Supreme Court· 2005-05-23· cited 1,034×
• United States v. Gilbert Isgar
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-01-13· cited 1,001×
• United States v. Charles
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-11-03· cited 161×
• United States v. Santiago
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-05-18· cited 114×
• United States v. Gulley
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-04-30· cited 112×
• United States v. John Addison Ballis
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-08-08· cited 84×
• United States v. Juan Jose Silva
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-08-18· cited 81×
• United States v. Joseph
  Fifth Circuit· 2003-06-09· cited 75×
• United States v. Turner
  Fifth Circuit· 2012-03-07· cited 74×
• United States v. Davis
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-11-07· cited 70×
• United States v. Jabori Huntsberry
  Fifth Circuit· 2020-04-10· cited 61×
• United States v. Kates
  Fifth Circuit· 1999-05-04· cited 57×
• United States v. Acosta
  Fifth Circuit· 2007-01-09· cited 56×
• United States v. Pereneal Kizzee
  Fifth Circuit· 2017-12-15· cited 36×
• United States v. Oladimeji Ayelotan
  Fifth Circuit· 2019-03-04· cited 34×
• United States v. Patterson
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-12-22· cited 33×
• United States v. Pollani
  Fifth Circuit· 1998-07-13· cited 32×
• Taylor v. Cain
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-10-13· cited 27×
• United States v. Coy Jones
  Fifth Circuit· 2019-07-02· cited 24×